Sunday, 17 June 2018

6. Athletics. Malaysia High Jumper. 17th June 2018


In this article, I am going to talk about athletics.

According to Internet search data, I obtained the data for Malaysian High Jumper, the main information is their height and their personal best,
I then draw a table below, jump above jumper height

Personal Best – Jumper height
Loo Kum Zee 1.76m
2.24 - 1.76 = .48
Lee Hup Wei 1.80m
2.28 - 1.80 = .48
Nauraj Singh Randhawa 1.93m

2.30 - 1.93 = .37

According to http://www.scholm.com/eng50.asp list updated in 2014, there are 50 jumpers world wide since 1968 (beginning of Fosbury Flop style) who jumped 50 cm above their height. Let assume by 2018, there are 55 jumpers. Let assume jumper need some years to optimize/perfecting their style, let assume the style is already optimized since 1978, so now it is 2018 about 40 years, with 55 jumper jumped above 50 cm. I think Loo Kum Zee and Lee Hup Wei, had already approaching their personal best limit. There are among the top 100-200 high jumper in the world since 1978, if you consider height difference. As far as their skill (Loo Kum Zee and Lee Hup Wei) are concerned they are world class, why they did not get a medal in Olympic or Commonwealth, it’s because their height is not tall enough.

If you do an analysis of jumper height and their personal best, most Olympic medallist jumper high is at least 1.90 meter and the average jump above jumper height is around 0.40meter.

If you consider current time, they are considered world class if you consider height difference.
If Nauraj Singh (need to improve his skill) can improve his technique to be around 0.42 meter above his height, then he can do 2.35 ( a medallist in Olympic). In high jump, jumper height does matter. In many sports, size does matter, a simple calculation will show everything. TQ for reading, spread this info around.


5. How freshness affect taste?17th June 2018.


From a simple conversation with a noodle stall operator I come to know about this.
The owner operates a CURRY MEE stall, I asked him why he no longer provide cockle (kerang) in his mee. His said the supplier give him spoiled Cockle, his customer complaint so he no longer give cockle to his customer as he cannot guaranteed the freshness.

I thought he can always buy from the market, boiled, peel off the shell and remove the dirty and serve it fresh to his customer. He said better buy the “ready peel cockle” as less work is involved. Now I understand. The same applies to Chow Keow Tew noodles. So one of the benchmark for these noodles, is that the stall operator must buy cockles from the market, boiled, peel off the shell and remove the dirty and serve it fresh to his customer. It is difficult to gauge the amount of cockles needed in 1 day. Thus, sometimes you will get overnight or multi night cockles (refrigerated), well that affect quality. Well, that why sometimes it’s nice sometimes it not nice. The same applies to prawns.

Let me go to the extreme side, well if you want good tasty food, must spend a lot of time making your own ingredient. E.g. A noodle operator made their own noodle before serving it to their customer, Nasi lemak operator make their own sambal. Most operator will find out which is the best sambal supplier, best tasting sauces and get it from their supplier and start cooking. Where got time to make their own SAMBAL or Special sauces. Maybe some specialized shop do it.

How about PAU and Bread? Every coffee shop got PAU in a machine correct? How many days the pau are there? Well, some people make $$ by dedicating their effort in opening up, pau shops selling fresh pau. There is one in Sri Kembangan and Dengkil. The same applies to Bread, which is made daily. Well, the taste and quality should be better than what you get from the machine or supermarket. Agree. So if price does not differs that much I will get it from a pau shops.

How about fruits? Due to logistic and commercial reason, the fruits we eat is not riped when it was plucked, so that it can last longer. What we buy it from the supermarket and eat it ‘s taste is always one to two grade below the best.  I wish there is an orchard which sells road by the road side. All the fruits must ripe on the tree before it is served. E.g Banana, papaya, mango.

Let goes to one extreme, let said I am a millionaires, I want total food quality/taste control. So I buy a farm, rear my own organic chicken/pig/cow/lamb/goat/fish, control what their eats. Then I also grow the plants such as sawi, cucumber and taugee for  the chicken rice shop. Later, I open a shop which sell chicken rice where the chicken is supplied from my own farm. I have 100% end to end control over the taste and texture of my meat. I guess nobody have done that yet in Malaysia. I do hope someday someone will as Malaysia have sufficient land to implement such scheme. Pls don’t ask me to do it, spread the ideas surely someone will take it up one day. I do hope to go to such restaurant b4 I died. If u know one let me know ok.

Saturday, 9 June 2018

4. Chinese Food Industry: How the Taste is affected? 9th June 2018


“Kedai Kopi model”.
A big tenant rented/owned a big shop lot normally a corner lot for a big sum of money. In 2018, normally depending on area and floor size it could be anywhere between RM10,000 – RM50,000 per month in Klang Valley.

He then will sub-rent to each stall operator at RM30 - 50 per day cash term or RM1000/- per month depending on what kind of food is sold. Noodle normally cheaper RM700-RM800, Rice normally more expensive RM1000, mix rice RM1500 and also “Tai Chow” RM2000, cooking special dishes on order.  It just an estimate, I don’t have the time to do the exact business survey and sometimes they also won’t tell you the model. Even if I can give you the exact figure, you will not be interested and figure will change year by year. The coffee shop owner will run the beverage business and the collected rented will cross-subside the rental for the whole shop.

Each stall hired their own staff. Depending on coffee shop arrangement, sometimes the dish washing operating is centralized and outsourced to coffee shop owner with a fee. Probably due to hygiene purpose and fulfilling the municipal council requirement. In most cases, each stall washes their own dishes.

It’s a symbiotic business relationship between stall operator and coffee shop owner where boundary are more or less clearly defined. Each helping each other indirectly. What I like about this operation are
Each stall operator can only sell specific food, WANTAN Mee and curry mee. Only 2-3 different type of noodles. It’s a specialized stall, the operator need to focus making a 2-3 type of nice food. If their food cannot sell, they will be doomed. So their food must be nice enough to attract customer. If they want to holiday it’s up to them, rental still goes on.

If you compare this to a MAMAK store, normally their operation are centralized, one owner. 2-3 chef cook 100+ varies of food, no specialization. Owner take all kind of deal. Workers remain poor forever, owner drive big cars. Everything is owner operate by hiring staff to perform their duties, 95% of the stall is not rented out. I have hardly seen any stall is rented out in Malay and Indian owner restaurant. If you know any let me know so I can make a case here.

Let me pose you a question,” Chef ABC only do WANTAN MEE for years and every day. One Chef XYZ can cook up to 50 different dishes of MEE for you. If you asked Chef ABC and XYZ to cook WANTAN MEE. Whose “WANTAN MEE” will taste better?
Off course, is it Chef ABC because he can only sell WANTAN, if his WANTAN Mee no good he is out of Business.
So from this argument, I will go to Coffee shop to eat my noodle instead of going to one stop shop which 2-3 chef cook 100 different type of dishes.

From this argument, if you compare WANTAN mee in a coffee shop with a shop that only sell “WANTAN MEE”, which one is better.
Another example, if you compare Chicken Rice stall in a coffee shop with a shop that only sell CHICKEN RICE, which one taste better. The shop may have taken additional risk, effort and most importantly TASTE, if their chicken rice cannot sell, the whole shop Rm10,000 monthly rental cannot be possibly be paid correct. So I would go for specialized SHOP for specialized FOOD, the price is more $expensive, but generally the taste should be better than 90% of the coffee shop operated stall. However, there is a caveat, the specialized shop must be owner operated/monitored. I have few complaints that some specialized shop the taste no longer good because it was so popular that is it franchised.

Another example will be specialized shop such as “BAK KUT TEH” Chicken rice etc with decades of reputation and most importantly I must be rest assured that the old chef or his disciple is still around and cooking the food.
Then what about restaurant where you go for your annual dinner? Well, that a different argument. The amount of ingredient use to prepare for Chinese restaurant dinner varies a lot. Thus I think is it a different argument.


Friday, 8 June 2018

3. LIFE PARTNER 8th June 2018


One fine day I chatted with Prof Goh, the topic of the conversation is how to find a life partner. He outlines few simple rule.
1st RULE: Both must understand each other. Upon passing the first rule, go to 2nd RULE
2nd RULE: Both must respect each other. Let said you like football, she like ballet. Bothe must respect each other choice.
3rd RULE: If you need assistance you partner is willing to help vice-versa.
The first 3 rules, should be fulfilled in order for a successful relationship.
4th RULE: Physical attraction. Not a necessary criteria but preferable to have.
Well, the mistake happen for men is that they look at the 4th RULE as main criteria.

Upon through investigation and ponder. I agreed with his judgemental advice. After long thought, I think this is “NOT LOVE”, this is search for compatible partner or friend. If you love someone, you won’t care much about all these rules but be prepared to suffer for incompatibility if any. If you love someone, just call her out for a date. See how it goes from there. If acceptable then get married, have kids etc.
Well, that is all from Professor Goh ground rule.

For western approach, one should look at the zodiac compatibility matrix at the end of this website link article.

I cannot put the photo here due to copyright reason. I have no time to type the information.
For Chinese, there also a lunar compatibility matrix at

Generally, one should get a partner whose age difference are in odd number of years.  Example, husband 22, wife is 21, 19, 17 etc.

For more accurate prediction, one should study Zi Wei Dou Shou and BaZi to find a compatible partner. In some calculation for certain people, there is recommendation for one to get married late in 30s or 40s, and for women to wed a husband who is much2 more older than them for happy marriage. The topic is too wide and lengthy to be covered. If most of the above criteria (prof GOH criteria + zodiac + lunar compatibility) is met, and there is not much discomfort/argument during dating proccess, then can proceed lah.

Thus, given these information, good luck in your hunting, scouting and dating process. In the process, you can selectively filter out incompatible candidates. Your life partner is one of your single important investment because you share most of your time with her/him.

Would you rather spend more time in getting the right partner or more time arguing /having hard times after marriage. For some, “I still young 20/wait later lah”, Right now you may not be interested ok fine but at the moment just add all your female friends in your facebook. U will be surprised if you need to date them later on. Vice-versa.

During my days, 20 years ago (before social networking), if you lost contact of one of your potential candidate girlfriend, what is the probability that you going to find her again. Let me tell U. It is “0000000000000000000000”. OK. With facebook, this is solved but it’s opened up the competition for others. So, happy hunting.!

Tuesday, 5 June 2018

2. Survival Biases


Once upon a time, one friend argued with me that many of his school mate who did not perform well in their studies are now a rich business man and those who studied very well in their exam, top student are at best driving a HONDA CIVIC, own a terrace house. He later on argued that this historical fact shows that only those who did not studied well can do well in life later on compared to those who studied well. The argument is later strengthen by the fact Bill Gates drop out from school to form MICROSOFT.

Now I have the answer to his argument. “SURVIVAL BIASES”. For more detail info, you view this video at youtube.com
Make sure you watch the video thoroughly.

From here, I do think that it is less important to follow those many people who are successful. If you follow them chances are you may not be as successful as they are. They are the survival due to various condition/luck/time/space or situation.
Yet, I think it is much much better to learn from those who have already failed (almost successful but finally failed) on what are the wrong decisions they made, the wrong timing/place/people and how to avoid it. This will help us to be more successful. E.g Lee Chong Wei, Milkha Singh in 400m 1960 olmypic.

In many failed businesses such as restaurant businesses, we virtually never get the chance to know why their business failed. Even if we get to meet them, they will not tell you. Thus, we rarely get the chance to learn from other mistake because you don't get to see them at the first place. They already dead before you see them.



1. Prisoner Dilemma

Prisoner Dilemma.

One fine day at MMU in 2003 (the exact year I cannot recall), Prof Norman Foo from New South Wales University gave us a talk. He briefly mentioned the topic “Prisoner Dilemma”. After learning about this term, I started googling and found more about it. I realized why all my past action is not successful; it is partly due to this factor. Today, I had fundamentally change the way I interact with others. I continued with the topic and found another topic called “Tragedy of Common”.

Later on in I think in 2015, I enrolled in a coursera course called “Game Theory “ from University of Tokyo. I am able to gain more about the topic mathematically such as formalize the prisoner dilemma in term of players' payoff.

OK. Enough about the technical term. Let talk about “Tragedy of Common”, let said in a public toilet, the municipal course put in some tissue paper. The first person who comes will maximize the usage of the tissue paper, leaving others to wash their ash with water as he would like to maximize his benefit. It happens everywhere, especially in ASIAN society. So don’t expect others to give way to you.

Another topic is “Prisoner Dilemma”, Suppose the police caught two persons (Ali and Baba) for an attempted burglary. The police do not have sufficient evidence to prosecute them. So the police keep Ali and Baba in a separate room. Here is the payoff table. Both Ali and Baba can choose to “Speak Up or Keep Quiet).


Baba Keep Quiet
Baba Speak Up
Ali Keep Quiet
Ali and Baba 2 year jail
Ali 2 year jail, baba free
Ali Speak Up
Ali free, Baba 10 year jail
Ali 10 year jail, Baba 10 year jail
(stable state)

Things will have been better if both of them keep quiet but since both of them wanted to maximize their payoff, thus will define choose to Speak Up. Thus, in the end both of them ended up with 10 years jail. This is the likely scenario especially dealing with someone who you don’t know. In life, it is the same thing, in a road, if you start to give way to one car, 10 cars will follow behind, you ended up wasted more time.

So how to solve this problem.
1st : Deal with people who you trust or know.
2nd : Play the same game multiple times so that you can punish unethical people .
3rd: For a start with strangers, always start with a small bet (Lost 5 minutes time, lost RM10 etc). If you lose it, other people take advantage of you, never-mind, you can afford to absorb such losses. Just blacklist that person.
I have said enough, if you find it interesting, want to know more/read below. You can email me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
From prisoner dilemma รจ Game theory, in life we are playing games with other. Human being is a tricky species to deal with. Sometimes, we win sometimes we lose, sometimes both player benefitted and sometimes both player loses. In life, upon reading this article, look for someone to play game with where both players can benefit.

From the payoff table (ali vs baba), in any game, one will end up with a stable state such as 10 years jail for Ali and Baba, once the game is in steady state, it is very difficult to go to other state. Example, in a society where people cheat each other, it’s already in a steady state where there is no trust in the society as such all deals may sound like this “Cash on delivery”.

As the game continues, you will find out that if you continue to take advantage of others, even unintelligent species such as “ANT” will be able to make a wise decision for their survival and the game will end up in a stable state.

Another example, is in a street 100 meter long where all the tourist are evenly distributed. There are 2 icecream seller who sells at equal price and taste. What is the optimal location to place their stall.

                                      25 m seller 1
                                  75 m seller 2

If they place their stall at 25m and 75m then all customers can be served equally. But both seller wanted to have more customer by moving to the center. In the end, it will be
                                                                                     50m
                                                                          Both seller at the center
                                                                                 (stable state)
And customer will be at disadvantage, having to walk at most 50 meters instead of 25 meters.


Another example, a paid toll “save you 10 minutes of your time in return for RM3”. You will find out that the average wages for 10 minutes is about RM3. I cannot recall the exact mathematic formulation but in game theory things will stabilized.

However, in life the game we play is unequal, Doctor vs Patient. “Real Estate Agent vs buyer/seller”. Doctor have more information than patient. He can manipulate the game to his advantage. However, doctor have the intention to make $$$ and patient want to get well. In the end, you see despite so many doctors today, people still get a lot of sickness. With so many lawyers, there is so many court cases.

Good Information Dissemination

 18th June 2024. I used to write blog but there is not much traffic in my blog. People simply don't read. So, who will be my target cust...